ICAO Executive Letter

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

OEM recommendations – Upset prevention and recovery

Based upon ICAO document 10011, Airbus, ATR, Boeing, Bombardier, Embraer and ICAO have created Revision 03 of the Airplane Upset Recovery Training Aid to emphasize the importance of prevention. This revision is expanded to include transport category straight wing propeller airplanes and regional jet airplanes.

Since the original airplane Upset Recovery Training Aid was published, many positive advances with regard to upset training and to Threat and Error Management (TEM) have been made.

The premise of this revision is that an upset exists anytime an airplane is diverging from what the pilots are intending it to do. Prior training practices (i.e. "close your eyes while the instructor drives the simulator to an upset", etc.) missed the primary objective for pilots to intervene as soon as an undesired airplane state starts occurring. This was due to the fact that an upset was previously defined as exceeding fixed parameters (unintentional pitch beyond +25 or -10 degrees or bank angles greater than 45 degrees or speed inappropriate for the conditions). Most recovery maneuver training was done only after exceeding these parameters, without paying attention to the reasons of these diversions. Therefore, this document redefines airplane upsets and uses the established concept of undesired airplane state and the pilot's awareness of this regardless of airspeed or specific pitch and/or bank angle parameters. The name of the document has been modified to reflect the criticality of recognition and prevention. Therefore, the name is now Airplane Upset Prevention and Recovery Training Aid (AUPRTA).

With focus upon recognition and avoidance, it is the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) motivation to ensure pilots are properly taught to operate their airplanes throughout the entire operational flight envelope.

Passing a type rating/skill test check ride is not a complete measure of how well the pilot(s) understand the performance and handling characteristics of their airplane, because this check is completed in a narrow band of the overall envelope. Training programs leading up to type rating checks are usually focused on the environment to be tested, rather than on the entire operational flight envelope the pilots will be exposed to.

Moreover, a large portion of the operational flight envelope where the pilots will usually operate is systematically managed through use of autopilots and auto thrust/throttle systems.

Therefore, it is realistically impossible for pilots to recognize and respond correctly to an undesired airplane state without having practical knowledge of the airplane performance and handling characteristics available (or not available) to them throughout the entire operational flight envelope.

With this document, it is the OEM's intent to emphasize that training within the entire operational flight envelope (as per AFM) is needed to develop pilots' awareness and handling skills, both in manual and automated flight. Training outside the operational flight envelope should not be necessary for awareness and skill development. Without first exposing pilots to the entire operational flight envelope, developing training sequences beyond this envelope could lead to significant negative transfer of training. Academic training and OEM recommended FSTD exercises (within the capabilities of existing simulation devices) to expose the pilots to the airplane's handling characteristics and performance envelope will add significant benefits to managing undesired airplane states and preventing upsets.

The OEM recommended training sequences within this document are grouped by upset-inducing topics, with each topic consisting of the exercise conditions, training objectives, description and rationale.

Recommended crew actions for both "Stall Recovery Procedure" and "Upset Recovery Techniques" as well as training scenarios have unanimous agreement among these OEMs and are reflected in this Training Aid.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.INTRODUCTION

2.AUPRTA Objectives

3.Definition of airplane Upset

4.Monitoring

5.Causes of airplane Upsets

5.1.Environmentally-Induced Airplane Upsets

5.2.Systems-Anomalies-Induced Airplane Upsets

5.3.Pilot-Induced Airplane Upsets

5.4.Misuse of Airplane Automation

6.Flight Fundamentals for Pilots

6.1.Flight Dynamics

6.2.Energy States

6.3.Aerodynamic Flight Envelope

6.4.Aerodynamics

6.5.Airplane Performance

6.6.Icing

6.7.Automation

6.8.Engine Flameout

7.Recovery From Airplane Upsets

7.1.Situational Awareness of an Airplane Upset

7.2.Miscellaneous Issues Associated With Upset Recovery

7.3.Airplane Upset Recovery Techniques

8.OEM Recommended Training Sequences

8.1.Aircraft Handling Characteristics

8.2.Upset Recognition and Recovery

8.3.Stall

8.4.Environmental factors

8.5.Wake Vortex

8.6.Mechanical / System-Induced

8.7.Pilot Factors

9.KEY POINTS HIGHLIGHTED THROUGHOUT THE TRAINING AID

10.ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1. INTRODUCTION

The goal of this "Airplane Upset Prevention and Recovery Training Aid" (AUPRTA) is to increase the ability of pilots to recognize and avoid situations that can lead to airplane upsets and to improve their ability to recover control of an airplane that diverges from a crew's desired airplane state.

This will be accomplished by reviewing basic aerodynamics, increasing awareness of potential upset situations and by application of this knowledge during simulator training scenarios

The education material and the recommendations provided in the Airplane Upset Prevention and Recovery Training Aid Rev3 has been reviewed, updated (where necessary) and agreed upon by many OEMs who were involved in various working groups in recent years. Additionally, the training and recovery recommendations contained within are unanimously agreed upon by these OEMs.

These recommendations are the result of experience derived in pertinent transport category airplanes and not concluded from simulator assumptions, or non-transport airplanes.

Because there are an infinite number of variables that comprise upset situations, it is not appropriate to attempt to define testing or checking criteria.

The goal is to avoid an upset, intervene if one is developing, or to regain control. Training to proficiency has shown to be the best and only way to achieve this goal.

OEMs have generally defined recommendations instead of procedures. This is because no two upsets are the same.

2. AUPRTA Objectives

The aim of this training aid is to:

• Acquire the knowledge to recognize and avoid upset situations
• Learn to take appropriate and timely measures to prevent further divergence
• Understand basic airplane aerodynamics
• Learn airplane maneuvering techniques throughout the airplane operational flight envelope to perform recoveries from upsets.

3. Definition of airplane Upset

An airplane upset is an undesired airplane state characterized by unintentional divergences from parameters normally experienced during operations.

An airplane upset may involve pitch and/or bank angle divergences as well as inappropriate airspeeds for the conditions.

Note: undesired airplane state is defined in the Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA) manual, ICAO Doc 9803, 1^st edition.

Deviations from the desired airplane state will become larger until action is taken to stop the divergence.

Return to the desired airplane state can be achieved through natural airplane reaction to accelerations, auto-flight system response or pilot intervention.

4. Monitoring

The OEMs believe that flight crew engagement combats complacency through active monitoring. Therefore, active monitoring is the critical element to ensure awareness and avoidance of undesired airplane states and provides the strongest countermeasure against startle. An engaged crew is in the best position to cope with undesired airplane states.

From the early stages of training, pilots acquire Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes to perform active monitoring throughout all operations and phases of flight. This should become part of the "competent pilot DNA".

In the context of undesired airplane states, active monitoring means keeping track of the environment, the airplane's energy state and flight path trajectory. This creates expectations about future airplane state to detect deviations in order to take timely corrective actions.

Flight Path Monitoring (Flight Safety Foundation)

Active monitoring is the responsibility of all crew members to ensure the airplane state is understood and correct for the situation.

5. Causes of airplane Upsets

An airplane upset is not a common occurrence. There are a variety of reasons why upsets occur, including:

• Environmentally-induced
• Systems-induced.
• Pilot-induced

5.1. Environmentally-Induced airplane Upsets

A predominant number of upsets has an environment element involved.

Because the crew cannot modify the environment, it is essential they are aware of the risks so they can be minimized or avoided all together.

Environmental conditions that could lead to an airplane upset include:

• Air Mass Related
• Wake Turbulence

5.1.1. Air Mass related

Air Mass related causes include:

• Turbulence:
  • Clear Air Turbulence
  • Mountain waves
  • Windshear
• Thunderstorms
  • Air Mass Thunderstorms
  • Frontal Thunderstorm
  • Microburst
• Icing

Turbulence, when extreme, can lead to airplane upsets, and/or structural damage. These incidents of turbulence can cause large airspeed, altitude, or attitude deviations.

Severe or extreme turbulence can be associated with CAT (Clear Air Turbulence), mountain waves, windshear, and thunderstorms.

5.1.1.1. Turbulence

5.1.1.1.1. Clear Air Turbulence (CAT)

Clear air turbulence (CAT) is defined by the FAA Aeronautical Information Manual as "high-level turbulence (normally above 15,000 ft above sea level) not associated with cumuliform clouds, including thunderstorms."

Although CAT can be encountered in any layer of the atmosphere, it is almost always present in the vicinity of jet streams.

5.1.1.1.2. Mountain Wave

Mountains are the greatest obstructions to wind flow. This type of turbulence is classified as "mechanical" because it is caused by a mechanical disruption of wind.

Over mountains, rotor or lenticular clouds are sure signs of turbulence. However, mechanical turbulence may also be present in air too dry to produce clouds.

5.1.1.1.3. Windshear

A rapid change in wind speed and/or direction over a relatively short distance in the atmosphere is the primary characteristic of windshear.

Thunderstorms and rain showers can produce violent windshears that are a hazard to safe flight (See Thunderstorms).

5.1.1.2. Thunderstorms

There are two types of thunderstorms: air mass and frontal.

5.1.1.2.1. Air Mass Thunderstorms

Air mass thunderstorms are randomly distributed in unstable air, and they develop from localized heating of the Earth's surface. As the heated air rises, it cools to form cumulus clouds, which can continue to develop vertically and produce precipitation in the higher levels.

Precipitation signals the beginning of the mature stage and the presence of a downdraft.

5.1.1.2.2. Frontal Thunderstorms

Frontal thunderstorms are usually associated with weather systems line fronts, converging wind, and troughs aloft. Frontal thunderstorms form in squall lines; last several hours; generate heavy rain, and possibly hail; and produce strong gusty winds, and possibly tornadoes.

The principal distinction in formation of these more severe thunderstorms is the presence of large, horizontal wind changes in both speed and direction at different altitudes in the actual thunderstorm.

This can cause the thunderstorm to be vertically tilted, which means the precipitation falls away from the heated updrafts resulting in a much longer maturity timeframe.

5.1.1.2.3. Microbursts

A more concentrated and powerful downdraft is known as a microburst.

These severe thunderstorm phenomena can occur anywhere convective weather conditions exist.

When a microburst downdraft reaches the ground, it spreads out horizontally and may form one or more horizontal vortex rings around the downdraft. The outflows are not always symmetrical, therefore no assumed performance changes can be determined.

It is vital to know that if encountered, some microbursts cannot be successfully recovered from using any known techniques.

5.1.1.3. Icing

Icing will lead to a large degradation in airplane performance if ice accumulation is allowed to build-up on airplane surfaces.

Although icing can accrete quickly, it usually accumulates over time.

The location and type of ice is critical to flight performance, hence the axiom "keep it clean".

Unexpected airplane handling characteristics can be expected with ice build-up.

Further information in Chapter 6.6. Icing.

5.1.2. Wake Turbulence

Wake turbulence is involved in the largest number of documented upset events. However, a wake turbulence encounter does not mean that a developed upset will occur.

A rotational vortex is created behind an airplane's wings as a result of lift created. The area of greatest vortex energy is within the small core at the center of the rotating air. The energy, and hence rotational force, dissipates rapidly from the core outward, even though a rotation still exists.

An encounter with wake turbulence usually results in a rapid but short rolling or pitch moment and, in rare instances, could cause structural damage to an airplane.

Opposing a roll moment using normal roll control (aileron and roll spoilers) is usually effective and induced roll is minimal in cases where the wingspan and ailerons of the encountering airplane extend beyond the rotational flowfield of the vortex core.

With either little or no input, an airplane encountering wake turbulence, will be expelled from the vortex.

5.2. Systems-Anomalies-Induced airplane Upsets

Improvement in airplane designs and equipment components has always been a major focus in the aviation industry. In spite of this continuing effort, there are still failures.

Some of these failures can lead to an airplane upset.

Most failures are survivable if correct responses are made by the flight crew.

Flight crews are trained to overcome or mitigate the impact of single or multiple failures.

5.2.1. Flight Instruments

Instrument failures infrequently occur.

All airplane operating manuals provide flight instrument information so that when failures do happen, the pilot can analyze the impact and select the correct procedural alternatives.

The following picture illustrates an airspeed indication discrepancy:

5.2.2. Autoflight Systems

Autoflight systems include the autopilot, auto-throttles, and all related systems that perform flight management and guidance.

The systems integrate information from a variety of other airplane systems.

As reliable as the autoflight systems have become, they can still malfunction.

The pilot community has tended to develop a great deal of confidence in the systems, and that has led to complacency in some cases.

Because of the integration of systems, full analysis to determine the cause of the anomaly can be difficult for a pilot.

5.2.3. Flight Control and Other Anomalies

Pilots need to be prepared for the unexpected (active monitoring)

Flight control anomalies, such as flap asymmetry, spoiler problems and others, are addressed in airplane operations manuals.

Unlike most system faults, flight control anomalies could require immediate action from the pilot.

5.3. Pilot-Induced airplane Upsets

5.3.1. Instrument Cross-Check

Pilots must cross-check and interpret the instruments. When a divergent indication exists from what was intended, it must be communicated to the other pilot and corrected with proper pitch, bank and power adjustments.

Misinterpretation of the instruments and/or lack of "active monitoring" by the pilots can lead to an airplane upset.

The following video illustrates an undesired airplane state due to an inappropriate airspeed in cruise:

5.3.2. Adjusting Attitude and Power

A satisfactory instrument cross-check is only part of the task because it is necessary for the pilot to ensure the correct adjustments to pitch, bank and power are made in order to control the airplane.

Control inputs are usually based upon understanding what the outcome should be.

If the pilot's control inputs are reactionary, unplanned or excessive, the airplane reaction may be a complete surprise.

A continued divergence from what is expected due to excessive control inputs can lead to an upset.

The following animation illustrates pilot flight control inputs that make the turbulence divergence larger instead of smaller.

There have also been instances when two pilots have applied opposing inputs simultaneously leading to an upset or a failure to recover from an upset.

5.3.3. Inattention and Complacency

A review of airplane upsets shows that inattention or neglect of "actively monitoring" can result in upsets.

Many events can be traced to inadequate instrument cross-check; for example, neglecting to monitor all the instruments or fixating on certain instrument indications and not detecting changes in others.

Although flight path control responsibility is shared while under ATC radar vectoring, situational awareness and vigilance cannot be relaxed and/or delegated to ATC.

5.3.4. Distraction From Primary Cockpit Duties

Distractions can be external or self-induced.

"Control the airplane first" has always been a guiding principle in flying.

Cockpit discipline is the principle that must be respected to ensure that at least one pilot is actively monitoring. It is impossible to intervene to stop a divergence if the crew is not actively monitoring the airplane.

A pilot who is aware of the energy and flight path is less likely to be startled and therefore more likely to deal with the situation with controlled inputs versus reactive responses.

5.3.5. Pilot Incapacitation

While this is a very rare occurrence, it does happen and pilots need to be prepared to react properly.

Incapacitation occurs in many forms ranging from sudden death to subtle, partial loss of mental or physical performance. Subtle incapacitations are the most dangerous and they occur the most frequently. Incapacitation effects can range from loss of function to unconsciousness or death.

Suspicion of some degree of gross or subtle incapacitation should also be considered when a crewmember does not respond to any verbal communication associated with a significant deviation from a standard procedure or standard flight profile. Failure of any crewmember to respond to a second request or a checklist response is cause for intervention.

Airlines must establish clear policy to address subtle incapacitation.

5.3.6. Vertigo or Spatial Disorientation

Spatial disorientation has been a significant factor in many airplane upset accidents when a crew member does not follow what they are seeing on the flight instruments because they believe the instruments are incorrect.

Spatial disorientation is the inability to correctly orient oneself with respect to the Earth's surface.

All pilots are susceptible to sensory illusions while flying at night or in certain weather conditions.

These illusions can lead to a conflict between actual attitude indications and what the pilot "feels" is the correct attitude.

Disoriented pilots may not be aware of their orientation error.

Many airplane upsets occur while the pilot is engaged in some task that takes attention away from the flight instruments.

Spatial disorientation usually impacts only one of the crew members. Therefore, if the other crew member recognizes something unexpected, it is imperative to communicate this observation or take control (including engaging AFS). Spatial disorientation is a form of incapacitation.

Airlines must establish clear policy to address spatial disorientation.

It must be emphasized that safe flight can only be accomplished when an effective instrument cross-check is being done.

This applies to IMC or VMC.

Any situation or factor that interferes with the flow of flight information to the pilots increases the potential for disorientation.

The pilot's responsibility in preventing airplane upsets due to spatial disorientation involves:

• Active monitoring
• Effective planning
• Disciplined adherence to SOPs

5.4. Misuse of airplane Automation

Technology in modern airplanes includes flight directors, autopilots, auto-throttles and flight management systems.

Systems will react to what the pilot commands even if it is not what the flight crew intended. Failure to confirm and monitor intended modes of operation may lead to an airplane upset.

Reliability of modern technologies can lead to overconfidence and eventual complacency.

The following video illustrates inappropriate use of vertical speed resulting in loss of airspeed:

5.4.1. Pilot-Induced Oscillations (PIO) / Airplane-Pilot Coupling (APC)

All airplane are developed and certified to ensure control is easy and well-behaved throughout the operational flight envelope.

Testing to ensure these good handling characteristics assumes that pilots are utilizing typical piloting techniques.

In some circumstances, pilot control inputs can cause unwanted secondary airplane motion that could lead or contribute to an upset or loss of control.

This condition occurs when a pilot's commands become out of phase with the airplane's motion.

During an upset recovery a PIO/APC can also be initiated when the pilot reacts with large rapid inputs before determining what is happening.

6. Flight Fundamentals for Pilots

Airplanes are designed, tested and certified based on accepted assumptions of how pilots will operate them, as well as various environmental and technical constraints (e.g. gusts or engine failure dynamics).

A primary assumption regarding pilot control inputs is that they are the result of training and experience and not arbitrary deflections in various axis.

Exaggerated rates and amounts of control deflection (over controlling) may cause an accelerating divergence of flight path control.

6.1. Flight Dynamics

Pilots are expected to make control inputs based on desired airplane reaction.

Control inputs appropriate at one point in the flight envelope might not be appropriate in another part of the flight envelope.
Pilots must have a fundamental understanding of flight dynamics in order to correctly determine the control input(s) necessary.

There must be a force, or a combination of forces, imposed on an airplane to achieve a desired trajectory. The generation of forces created by control inputs is the subject of aerodynamics (to be discussed later).

6.2. Energy States

A pilot has three sources of energy available to manage or manipulate the flight path of an airplane.

The term "energy state" describes how much of each kind of energy the airplane has available at any given time.

Pilots who understand the airplane energy state will be in a position to know instantly what options they may have to maneuver their airplane and therefore manage the trajectory.

The three sources of energy are:

1. Kinetic energy, which increases with increasing airspeed.
2. Potential energy, which is proportional to altitude.
3. Chemical energy, from the fuel in the tanks which can be converted to thrust.

These three types of energy can be traded, or exchanged:

• Airspeed can be traded for altitude (kinetic to potential energy)
• Altitude can be traded for airspeed (potential to kinetic energy)
• Thrust can be converted into airspeed and/or altitude (chemical to either kinetic or potential energy)

Kinetic energy needs to be replenished (from potential or chemical energy), as it is continuously expended in the process of generating the aerodynamic forces acting on the airplane which result in controlled flight (lift and drag).

This process of consciously controlling the energy state of the airplane is referred to as "energy management".

The trading of energy must be accomplished with a view toward the final required energy state.

The objective of energy management is to keep the desired kinetic, potential and chemical energy within operating limits.

This objective is especially important during an inadvertent upset and the ensuing recovery.

The process of controlling forces to produce a new energy state takes time.

The amount of time required is a function of the mass of the airplane and the magnitude of the applied forces.

Airplanes of larger mass generally take longer to change orientation than airplanes of smaller mass. The longer time requires the pilot to plan ahead more in a large-mass airplane to make sure that the actions taken will achieve the final desired energy state.

Additionally, the effects of commanded thrust changes on turboprop airplanes are much more rapid than on large turbofan airplanes.

6.3. Operational Flight Envelope

Airplanes are designed to be operated in well-defined envelopes of airspeed and altitude.

The operational limits for an airplane - stall speeds, placarded maximum speeds/Mach number and maximum certificated altitudes - are in the AFM for each individual airplane.

6.4. Aerodynamics

Aside from gravity and thrust forces, the other forces acting on an airplane are generated as a result of the changing pressures produced on the surfaces that result in turn from the air flowing over them.

6.4.1. Angle of Attack and Stall

Most force-generating surfaces on modern transport category airplanes are carefully tailored to generate lifting forces efficiently.

Wings and tail surfaces all produce lift forces in the same way. The figure below shows a cross section of a lifting surface and the familiar definition of angle of attack versus lift.

It is important to understand the dependence of lift on angle of attack. The figure below shows how lift varies with angle of attack for constant speed and air density.

As angle of attack is increased, lift increases proportionally and this increase in lift is generally linear up to a point.

At the critical angle of attack, the air moving over the upper surface can no longer remain attached to the surface, the flow breaks down and the surface is considered stalled.

Wing shape influences the lift curve slope as illustrated in the figure below by the coefficient of lift C_L. The steepness of the slope affects the rate at which lift changes due to angle of attack. Straight wing and swept wings behave differently at higher angles of attack in turn affecting stall behavior.

For a straight wing, small differences in angle of attack produce notable changes in lift and potentially a quicker stall recovery when the angle of attack is reduced.

Swept wings stall at higher angles of attack and the stall (g break) may not be so well defined.

It is necessary to understand that this breakdown of the flow and consequent loss of lift is dependent only on the angle of attack of the surface.

Exceed the critical angle of attack and the surface will stall and lift will decrease instead of increase. This is true regardless of airplane speed or attitude or wing shape.

To sustain a lifting force on the aerodynamic surfaces, the pilot must ensure that the surfaces are flown at an angle of attack below the stall angle.

There is not typically an angle-of-attack indicator in most commercial transport airplanes.

The three angles usually referred to in the longitudinal axis are:

• Angle of attack.
• Flight path angle.
• Pitch angle.

These three angles and their relationships to each other are shown in the below figure.

Pitch angle is the angle between the longitudinal axis of the airplane and the horizon.
This angle is displayed on the attitude indicator or artificial horizon.

Angle of attack is the difference between the pitch angle (attitude) and the flight path angle with no wind component.

Flight path angle is the angle between the flight path vector and the horizon.
This is also the climb (or descent angle).
In Level Flight (FPA=0), the pitch attitude equals the angle of attack.

An airplane wing can approach the stall angle of attack at any airspeed (beware that at airspeeds above design maneuver speed, V_A or near maximum flap speeds V_FE, the wing can generate enough lift to cause it to fail due to structural overload before reaching the stall angle of attack).

An airplane can be stalled in any attitude.

If the angle of attack is greater than the stall angle, the surface will stall.

A stall is characterized by any or a combination of the following:

1. Buffeting, which could be heavy
2. Lack of pitch authority
3. Lack of roll control
4. Inability to arrest descent rate

These characteristics are usually accompanied by a continuous stall warning and possibly stick pusher activation (if so equipped).

A stall must not be confused with an approach-to-stall warning that occurs before the stall and warns of an approaching stall.

Stall speeds are published in the AFM for each transport airplane, giving the speeds at which the airplane will stall as a function of weight and flap angle.

Turboprop pilots should also be aware that "powered lift" effect can result in activation of stall warning occurring at indicated airspeeds well below the published stall speeds, due to an increase in lift from slipstream flowing over the wing at all angles of attack (including the angle of attack for stall warning). The effect of thrust or power on stall speeds cannot be used in considering the minimum acceptable speed during any phase of flight.

Most upsets are quite dynamic in nature and involve elevated load factors and large speed-change rates.

Pilots should not expect the airplane to remain unstalled just because the indicated airspeed is higher than AFM chart speeds, because the conditions may be different.

All transport category airplane are certified to exhibit adequate warning of impending stall to give the pilot opportunity to recover by decreasing the angle of attack.

Whether this warning is by natural aerodynamic buffet or provided by a stick shaker or other warning devices, it warns the pilot when the angle of attack is getting close to stall.

Pilots need to be especially cognizant of stall warning cues for the specific airplanes they fly.

Any stall warning should be taken as an indication to decrease the angle of attack unless otherwise indicated by an OEM procedure.

The angle of attack at which a wing stalls also reduces with increasing Mach so that at high Mach (normally, high altitude), an airplane will stall at an angle of attack that is less than the angle of attack for stalling at lower Mach numbers.

6.4.2. Lateral and Directional Aerodynamic Considerations

Aerodynamically, anti-symmetric flight, or flight in sideslip, can be quite complex.

The forces and moments generated by the sideslip can affect motion in all three axes of the airplane.

Sideslip can generate aerodynamic rolling moments as well as yawing moments. Inappropriate rudder inputs will aggravate the situation. Extreme care must be taken whenever a pilot chooses to use rudder to correct sideslip.

6.4.2.1. Angle of Sideslip

Sideslip angle is the angle between the longitudinal axis of the airplane and the relative wind (see figure below).

It is a measure of whether the airplane is flying straight into the relative wind.

With the exception of crosswind landing considerations requiring pilot-commanded sideslip, transport airplanes are typically flown at or very near zero sideslip.

6.4.2.2. Wing Dihedral Effects

6.4.2.3. Pilot-Commanded Sideslip

The rudders on transport airplanes are sized to counter the yawing moment associated with an engine failure at very low takeoff speeds and to conduct crosswind takeoffs and landings, using up to maximum pedal input.

An excessive rudder input can produce a large sideslip angle, which will generate a rolling moment that requires significant lateral control input to stop the airplane from rolling.

The rudder should not normally be used to induce roll through sideslip because the result can be rapid roll rates after significant time delays from the initial input.

The overreaction can induce abrupt yawing moments and violent out-of-phase roll rates, which can lead to successive cyclic rudder deflections, known as rudder reversals as the pilot tries to control the resulting motions.

Large aggressive control reversals induce loads that can exceed structural design limits.

Except in crosswind takeoff and landing, keeping the sideslip as close to zero as possible will ensure that the maximum amount of lateral control is available for maneuvering.

Rudder should only be used in combination with ailerons/spoilers to eliminate sideslip, not create it.

Pilots should develop a feel for the particular airplanes they fly and understand how to minimize sideslip angle through coordinated use of flight controls.

6.4.2.4. Crossover Speed - Jet Airplane (JET)

6.4.2.5. Propeller Effects Turboprop Airplane (PROP)

6.4.2.5.1. Asymmetric Power Effects (PROP)

6.4.2.5.1.1 Asymmetric Propeller Loading Effect (PROP)

6.4.2.5.1.2 Asymmetric Lift Distribution Effect (PROP)

6.4.2.5.2 Powered Lift Effects (PROP)

6.4.2.5.3. Slipstream Effect (PROP)

6.4.2.5.4. Engine Torque Effect (PROP)

6.4.3. Stability

Positive static stability is defined as the initial tendency to return to an undisturbed state after a disturbance (Fig. 29).

All transport airplane demonstrate positive static stability in at least some sense.

Positive Static Stability will cause the airplane to recover from a divergence without any pilot input; therefore pilots must not arbitrarily react before analyzing the situation

6.4.4. Maneuvering Flight

It is important that pilots understand their airplane's feel and response characteristics to flight control inputs.

In straight and level un-accelerated flight, the load factor is 1G. Any maneuvering in pitch or roll will either increase or decrease the load factor from 1 g. This increase or decrease will impact maneuver capability and stall margin.

6.4.4.1. Longitudinal, Lateral and Directional Controls

• Movement about the lateral axis is called "pitch", as depicted in figure here-above.

  The pilot controls pitching motion (and therefore the angle of attack) by means of the elevator.

  The elevator is the primary control in pitch. The trim system of an elevator or horizontal stabilizer is the secondary control to reduce the need for the pilot to hold constant force.

  Pitching about the center of gravity changes the airplane angle of attack.

  Maneuvering in pitch, also changes the Load Factor.

  Additionally there will be pitch effects from thrust changes when engines are offset from the center of gravity

  

• Movement about the longitudinal axis is called "roll".

  The ailerons (and roll spoilers) are the primary controls in roll.

  The result of increasing bank (rolling) is a re-orientation of the lift vector from the vertical, which in turn creates a horizontal lift component as well as a reduced vertical lift component. The result of this imbalance of forces is a curved descending flight path.

• Movement about the vertical axis is called "yaw".

  Airplanes are certified to withstand a full scale rudder deflection from neutral, in one direction. Reversing the rudder from one direction to another is not considered in certification and can result in excessive structural loads, even at slow airspeeds.

  It is important to emphasize that rudder limiters do not protect against the structural loads or excessive sideslip angles that can be generated from rapid rudder reversals at any airspeed.

  The rudder is the primary control in yaw.

  The rudder is intended to be used to control yaw in two ways, either to minimize the angle of sideslip or to create yaw to correct for crosswind during take-offs and landings.

  The rudder is not intended to be used as a primary roll control. Pilots should be completely aware that experience on non-transport category airplane which emphasizes use of rudder input as a means to maneuver in roll does not apply to transport category airplanes.

  However, when all normal means of roll control have been unsuccessful, careful rudder input in the direction of the desired roll should be considered to induce or augment a rolling maneuver or to provide the desired bank angle.

  Other than to reduce sideslip, rudder input is never an appropriate initial response for events such as a wake vortex, windshear, or to reduce the bank angle during any upset including a stall event

  The objective of all maneuvering is to manipulate the forces on the airplane in order to orient the flight path.

6.4.5. Load Factor

Understanding effects of Load Factor is critical to properly understand the mechanics and performance of maneuvering Flight.

Load factor (n) is a measure of loads on the airplane structure during flight. Load factor is referred to in terms of acceleration of gravity or "g" value.

n = Lift / Weight

When the wing is producing lift equal to 1 times the weight of the airplane, it is oriented in a direction opposed to the gravity vector and is referred to as a load factor of 1g.

During maneuvering, the load factor will be either greater or less than 1g.

In a pull-up, the wing generates lift greater than the weight of the airplane and the load factor is above 1g (see figure below).

In a turn, the result of increasing bank (rolling) is a re-orientation of the lift vector from the vertical, which in turn decreases the vertical lift component.

Acceleration due to gravity still points toward the Earth, therefore an imbalance in the vertical forces develops.

Unless lift is increased so that its vertical component equals the weight of the airplane, the airplane will begin to accelerate toward the Earth - it will begin to descend.

To maintain altitude in a banked turn, the lift produced by the airplane must be more than the weight of the airplane. The increase of lift required is a function of bank angle and therefore the load factor will increase (see figure below).

6.4.6. High-Altitude Characteristics (JET)

6.4.7. High Altitude Turboprop Characteristics (PROP)

6.5. Airplane Performance

6.5.1. L/D_MAX

The lowest point on the total drag curve (as indicated in figure below) is known as L/D_MAX (or V_md - minimum drag speed).

The speed range slower than L/D_MAX is known as slow flight, which is sometimes referred to as the "back side of the power-drag curve", "region of reverse command" or "second regime".

Speed faster than L/D_MAX is considered normal flight, or the "front side of the power-drag curve" or "first regime".

Flight faster than L/D_MAX is inherently stable with respect to speed.

When operating in level flight at a constant airspeed with constant thrust or power setting, any airspeed disturbance (such as turbulence) will result in the airspeed eventually returning to the original airspeed.

Flight slower than L/D_MAX is inherently unstable with respect to speed and thrust/power settings.

When operating at a constant airspeed with constant thrust/power setting, any disturbance in the second regime causing a decrease in airspeed will result in a further decrease in airspeed unless power is increased.

Figure 39 shows that lower speed will result in increased drag.

The increase in drag will cause a further decrease in airspeed, which may ultimately result in a stalled flight condition.

Flight slower than L/D_MAX at high altitudes must be avoided.

When operating slower than L/D_MAX, and where total drag exceeds total thrust or power, the airplane will be unable to maintain altitude and the only remaining option to exit the slow flight regime is to initiate a descent.

Many factors can cause airspeed decay. These include, changing winds or temperature increased drag during turns, turbulence, icing, use of anti-ice, auto-throttle or engine malfunctions etc.

Fuel efficient flight profiles may require high altitude cruise at lower speed or Mach numbers resulting in less time to recognize and respond to speed deterioration at high altitude.

Slow reacting auto-throttles, designed for passenger comfort, may not apply thrust quickly enough to prevent a slowdown below L/D_MAX.

Undetected, any speed decay is an undesired airplane state.

Proper flight planning, adherence to published climb profiles, cruise speeds and a flight crew actively monitoring the flight will ensure that speeds slower than L/D_MAX are avoided.

6.5.2. Optimum Altitude

Optimum altitude for a weight and atmospheric conditions are based upon air temperature and operating speed margins. Therefore, temperature must be monitored when operating close to L/D_MAX to ensure performance is maintained.

6.5.3. Optimum Climb Speed Deviations

Airplane manuals and flight management systems provide optimum climb speeds.

When increased rates of climb are required, the crew must ensure the speed is not decreased below L/D_MAX.

On some airplane types, minimum climb speeds may be higher when operating in icing conditions to ensure adequate airspeed margins are maintained with contamination on the lifting surfaces.

Inappropriate use of the autoflight system V/S mode causes many slow speed events during high altitude climbs.

Pilots must be aware that when using V/S mode, the selected V/S takes precedence over selected Airspeed/Mach, hence an excessive V/S climb will result in a speed decay that will not be stopped until the pilot or autoflight system intervenes.

6.5.4.Maximum Altitude

Maximum altitude is the highest altitude at which an airplane can be operated.

When operating at Maximum Altitude for an airplane type, the margins are at the minimum required by regulation resulting in reduced bank angle capability; therefore, autopilot or crew inputs must be kept below buffet thresholds.

When operating near the maximum altitude in unstable atmospheric conditions, speed and angle of attack have minimum margin to cope with environmental changes. This could lead to a slowdown or stall and subsequent high altitude upset.

In the event of a thrust/power loss, the airplane may suddenly change from a condition of sufficient thrust/power for the operating altitude to a condition of flying above the Thrust or Power Limited altitude. If a "drift down" is not initiated, the airspeed will decrease and the airplane will enter an upset.

6.5.5. Weight & Balance Effects on Handling Characteristics

Pilots must be aware of the effects on handling qualities resulting from different center of gravity. An airplane loaded toward the forward center of gravity limits will be more stable, while an airplane loaded toward the aft center of gravity limits will be less stable.

The more stable an airplane becomes, the less maneuverable it will be. Conversely, the less stable an airplane becomes, the more maneuverable it will be. This is most noticeable the closer the airplane is loaded to the center of gravity limits.

With an aft center of gravity, less force is required by the tail to counteract the nose down pitching moment of the wing. This results in less induced drag and more efficient flight. For this reason, aft center of gravity loadings are usually planned to achieve less fuel burn. An aft center of gravity loaded airplane will be more responsive and consequently more sensitive to pitch control inputs.

With a forward center of gravity, the elevator control authority to raise the nose of the airplane is reduced. airplane without a trimmable horizontal stabilizer and loaded at forward center of gravity will require more pilot force to produce nose up pitch. This is particularly noticeable at take-off and landing.

An airplane that is outside the weight and balance envelope can result in airplane handling that can be unpredictable. The problem may be exacerbated at high altitude.

6.5.6. Maximum Speeds

M_MO and/or V_MO define the maximum operating speed for each airplane type.

V_MO is defined by the maximum loads that the airframe is designed to withstand in response to atmospheric gusts, turbulence or maneuvering by the pilot.

Exceeding V_MO or M_MO can occur for various reasons and all transport airplane are designed to allow for minor exceedances and the use of normal piloting skill to recover back to the normal operational flight envelope.

It is imperative to not over-react to an airspeed exceedance with large and drastic inputs in order to avoid placing large maneuvering loads on the airframe.

Pilots should smoothly adjust pitch and/or power to reduce speed should an overspeed occur.

There is no need to immediately disconnect a correctly functioning autopilot if the AFS is commanding a return back to the normal flight envelope (unless OEM procedures dictate otherwise).

Inadvertent airspeed excursions above V_MO/M_MO should be treated very seriously.

The airspeed must be reduced to within the operational flight envelope for the following reasons:

• Flight at very high airspeeds puts the airplane in a region of reduced protection from gusts, turbulence or structural loads.
• Flight at very high Mach numbers puts jet airplanes in a region of reduced maneuvering envelope.

At very high airspeeds, very high control power exists. The airplane reaction to a fixed control deflection is significantly greater at high speeds than at low speeds. Care must be taken to remain inside the maneuvering envelope to avoid exceeding structural limits.

At any speed, large aggressive control deflection reversals can lead to loads that can exceed structural design limits.

6.6. Icing

In-flight icing is a serious hazard. By disturbing the smooth flow of air on the airplane, icing will increase drag, decrease the ability of an airfoil to produce lift and degrade control authority.

The lift distribution characteristics along the wing may be affected by even trace amounts of ice contamination. During the progression of a stall condition, flow separation on the contaminated aerofoil may be affected and the pitch and/or roll characteristics may be different from those of an uncontaminated wing. Until the angle of attack is reduced below the stall angle, pitch and roll excursions could be extreme.

Transport category airplane are certified to operate in a wide range of icing conditions. Pilots must understand, however, that any amount of ice accretion on the lifting surfaces has a detrimental effect on the airplane. When operating in icing conditions, they must use ice protection systems as required by the procedures contained in the airplane Flight Manual and adhere to minimum airspeeds (if applicable) to ensure the airplane remains in the demonstrated operational flight envelope.

Ice protection systems on transport category airplane generally operate on one of two principles - de-icing or anti-icing.

De-icing systems are designed to remove ice after it has begun to accumulate on the airplane. Because some residual ice continues to adhere between system cycles, the surface is never entirely aerodynamically "clean". The effects of the residual ice are evaluated during certification and AFM procedures published to ensure acceptable handling and performance characteristics are retained.

Anti-icing systems are designed to keep the protected areas of a surface entirely free of ice during an icing encounter. Anti-icing systems can be evaporative or "running wet". On a running wet anti-icing system, liquid water may run back to colder areas behind the protected areas and re-freeze - commonly referred to as "run back" ice. The effects of these accretions are evaluated for certification. Note that runback ice can serve as accretion sites for additional accumulations in an extended icing encounter, and these accumulations may exceed the amount and position of ice demonstrated during certification.

"Run back" ice will continue to affect the airplane after the protected surface ahead of the ice formation is clear of ice. The only way to remove "runback" ice is to find warm air conditions significantly above freezing to allow the ice to melt.

While transport category airplane are certified to operate in icing conditions defined by the certification process, there are icing conditions that may exceed the certification criteria.

Flights in freezing rain, freezing drizzle or certain mixed icing conditions may encounter water droplets that are larger than those defined in certification criteria and are referred to as super-cooled large water droplets (SLD).

An SLD encounter may rapidly exceed the capability of the ice protection system and lead to ice build-up on protected surfaces or run back ice forming aft of the protected surfaces. Ice encountered in SLD conditions may seriously degrade the performance and controllability of the airplane.

Flight crews encountering SLD icing must immediately follow any special procedures published in the AFM to ensure the airplane is operated in the correct configuration and alter their flight path to exit those conditions.

Flight crews must also be especially wary of automation during icing encounters. Autopilots can mask the effects of airframe icing and consequent changes in performance and handling qualities which can contribute to ultimate loss of control.

6.6.1. Flight In Icing Conditions (PROP)

6.6.1.1. Effects of SLD Icing on Un-Powered Aileron Controls (PROP)

6.7. Automation

The purpose of an automated flight system (AFS) is to assist the pilot and not replace them. An AFS will do what it has been programmed to do within the capabilities of its certified envelope.

By design, an AFS has sufficient authority to adjust for unusual conditions until the commands reach full authority of the system, or cannot be sustained.

Approaching the limits of an AFS can mask the actual airplane trim state as well as resultant changes in performance and handling qualities.

If such conditions go unnoticed, the airplane state may deteriorate leading to an undesired airplane state unless the pilot properly recognizes the compromised condition and initiates recovery.

If the auto trim system has been adjusting longitudinal trim as the airplane slows down, a large push force may be required to lower the airplane nose and regain airspeed when the autopilot is disengaged (or automatically disengages).

During cruise at high altitude, the autopilot will be engaged with the pitch in an altitude hold mode and the auto throttles in a speed mode (if equipped).

Changing atmospheric conditions can exceed the limits of thrust or power available and if that is the case, the crew will be required to descend to a lower cruise altitude.

The primary target parameter of the vertical speed (V/S) mode of the AFS is the selected vertical climb or descent rate with airspeed normally controlled by thrust through thrust adjustment. However the speed will not be maintained if the descent or climb rate is excessive.

When an excessive vertical descent rate is selected, idle thrust may not be low enough to hold the selected airspeed and the airplane will speed up. The AFS would be doing exactly what it was commanded to do even though the command was inappropriate.

Conversely, if an excessive climb rate is selected, the thrust available can be less than the thrust required for that selected vertical speed rate. Because the AFS primary parameter in V/S is the target vertical speed the selected airspeed must be sacrificed when maximum available thrust is less than what would be needed to respect the commanded V/S, the result will be airspeed decay.

At lower altitudes, thrust/power available might be sufficient to allow both the selected V/S climb rate and command airspeed to be maintained, but as altitude increases, the thrust available decreases which can eventually result in airspeed decay while the AFS maintains the target vertical climb rate.

As a general guideline, V/S should not be used for climbing at high altitudes in sweptwing jet airplane or at any altitude in straight wing turboprop airplane.

Manual throttle systems, or inadvertent auto throttle disengagement at or near idle during a descent will also result in speed decay at level off if the thrust or power is not advanced to arrest the decay in airspeed as the autopilot commands the airplane nose up to maintain the programmed vertical flight path. The airplane can quickly enter a low energy situation causing an undesirable airplane state which can result in a stall.

Pilots must understand the performance of their airplanes when selecting vertical modes.

V/S can be used for descent; however, selecting excessive vertical speeds can result in airspeed increases into an overspeed condition.

6.8. Engine Flameout

An upset can result in an engine flameout, and conversely an inappropriate response to an engine flameout can lead to an upset.

Undesired airplane states that result in very low airspeed, stall conditions, large sideslip angles or other occurrences that reduce or distort the flow of air into the engine intakes, may lead to thrust or power fluctuations or even to engine flameout(s).

At higher thrust/power settings an engine flameout should be quite obvious to detect however at thrust/power settings near idle it will be less obvious. The first indication to a flight crew of an engine anomaly may be a lack of thrust response, or yawing and/or rolling moments due to asymmetric thrust, when the thrust or power levers are advanced.

7. Recovery From airplane Upsets

Previous sections have reviewed causes of airplane upsets to emphasize awareness and avoidance of airplane upsets.

Basic aerodynamic information indicates how and why transport airplanes fly.

The information provides the foundation of knowledge necessary for intervention in order to recover an airplane that is diverging from desired flight conditions.

This section highlights several issues associated with airplane upset recovery and presents basic recommended airplane recovery techniques and training scenarios for pilots.

There is an infinite number of situations that pilots can experience while flying an airplane.

The techniques that are presented in this section are applicable for most situations.

It must be emphasized that the degree of upset will define how prompt or aggressive the required control inputs will be to recover from the event.

In all cases the pilot response to an upset must be appropriate to arrest and recover the condition.

Up to full-scale control deflections may be necessary. However, initiating recovery with arbitrary full-scale control deflections could actually aggravate the situation.

An excessive or inappropriate control input that overshoots the desired response can startle the pilot and cause one upset to lead to another.

Pilots must be or become situationally aware before they are able to take appropriate actions.

An overview of actions to recover from an upset would encompass three basic activities:

1. Assess the energy (become situationally aware)
2. Arrest the flight path divergence
3. Recover to a stabilized flight path

These three activities must be part of every recovery from an upset.

7.1. Situational Awareness of an airplane Upset

A pilot actively monitoring is an engaged pilot who has a wealth of information available to them in modern cockpits. Consequently, they are more situationally aware than all previous generations of pilots.

An engaged pilot will be ready to intercept an unintentional airplane divergence which is the overwhelming goal: avoid an upset from developing in the first place.

The first actions for recovering from an airplane upset must be correct and timely.

It is very important for the crew to realize the differences in airplane handling at high altitude, versus low altitude (less thrust/power available and more sensitive flight controls).

Managing startle is imperative all the time, but particularly in high altitude conditions where the pilot has the least amount of hands on experience to manipulate the airplane.

The key point is to use gentle control inputs and not arbitrary open loop inputs.

Exaggerated control inputs through reflex responses must be avoided.

An excessive or inappropriate control input that overshoots the desired response can startle the pilot and cause one upset to lead to another.

Troubleshooting the cause of the upset is secondary to initiating the recovery. However, the pilot still must recognize and confirm the situation before a recovery can be initiated. Regaining and then maintaining control of the airplane is paramount.

Communication between crew members will assist in the recovery actions.

At the first indication of a flight path divergence, both pilots should announce what is being observed.

It is necessary to use the primary flight instruments and the airplane performance instruments when analyzing the upset situation.

Visual meteorological conditions may allow the use of references outside the airplane; however, it can be difficult to see the horizon if the field of view is restricted due to window geometry and overhead panel placement during both high and low pitch attitudes.

Pilots must be prepared to analyze the situation during darkness and when instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) exist.

The PFD or Attitude Indicator is a primary reference for recovery.

For a nose low upset, normally the airspeed is increasing, altitude is decreasing and the vertical speed indicator (VSI) indicates a descent.

For a nose high upset, the airspeed normally is decreasing, altitude is increasing and the VSI indicates a climb.

Other attitude sources must be cross checked for accuracy of interpretation of the situation. These sources include, but are not limited to the Standby Attitude Indicator and the pilot monitoring (PM) instruments.

Pitch attitude is determined from the PFD or Attitude Indicator pitch reference scales.

The bank indicator on the PFD/Attitude Indicator should be used to determine the airplane bank.

The situation analysis process is to:

• Assess the energy
• Confirm the airplane attitude (pitch and bank angle)
• Communicate with other crew member(s).

Recovery techniques presented later in this section include the phrase, "Recognize and confirm the situation". This situation analysis process is used to accomplish that technique.

7.2. Miscellaneous Issues Associated With Upset Recovery

There are issues associated with differences between simulator training and on-airplane recoveries.

A simulator can provide the basic fundamentals for upset recovery, but some realities such as positive, negative and lateral g's, startle factor and environmental conditions are difficult or impossible to replicate.

The physical and psychological effects and the airplane response during recovery can be significantly different from that experienced during simulator training.

Simulator limitations at the edges of the flight envelope can also cause fidelity issues because the simulator recovery may not have the same response characteristics as the airplane.

7.2.1. Startle Factor

It has already been stated that airplane upsets do not occur very often and that there are multiple causes for these unpredictable events.

An engaged pilot will be ready to intercept an unintentional airplane divergence which is the overwhelming goal to avoid an undesired airplane state from developing in the first place.

Unexpected low airspeed, stall warnings, buffeting and large changes in airplane attitude (design dependent) when the airplane is on autopilot can startle an un-engaged flight crew.

Pilots are usually surprised or startled when a dynamic upset does occur, even if they are engaged through actively monitoring, but they will be better situationally aware to adapt to the situation.

An un-engaged pilot will need to regain situational awareness in order to identify the situation. Only an engaged (and therefore situationally aware) pilot/crew can effectively recover from an upset.

The pilot must overcome the surprise and quickly shift into analysis of what the airplane is doing and then implement the proper recovery.

Pilots must avoid reacting before analyzing what is happening and avoid fixating on one indication instead of diagnosing the situation.

Effective training and crew engagement (active monitoring) during all cockpit activity is the best insurance to deal with startle factor.

Troubleshooting the cause of the upset is secondary to initiating the recovery and regaining control of the airplane.

7.2.2. Force less than 1 G

Pilots are normally uncomfortable with unloading g forces to less than 1 g on passenger airplanes.

They must overcome this reluctance if faced with a situation that requires unloading the airplane to less than 1 g by pushing forward on the pitch controls.

While flight simulators can replicate normal flight profiles, they cannot replicate sustained g forces, other than 1 g.

Pilots must anticipate a significantly different feeling in flight during less than 1 g situations.

7.2.3. Use of Full Control Inputs

Utilizing up to full flight control inputs is not a part of routine airline flying.

Pilots must be prepared to use full flight control authority if the situation warrants it.

Flight control inputs are more effective at increased speed/reduced angle of attack.

Conversely, at low airspeeds or approaching the critical angle of attack, larger control inputs are needed for the same airplane response.

Attitude and flight path changes can be very rapid during an upset, which could require large or even full scale control inputs.

It is critical to guard against control reversals.

There is NO situation that will require rapid full-scale control deflections from one side to the other.

7.2.4. Counter-Intuitive Factors

It may be counter-intuitive to use forward pitch control deflections near the ground when recovering from a high angle of attack. However, if the airplane is stalled while already in a nose down attitude, the pilot must still push the nose down in order to reduce the angle of attack.

Altitude cannot be maintained and should be of secondary importance.

7.2.5. Previous Training in Non-similar airplanes

A large risk exists for pilots to revert to previous experiences and/or training appropriate to Non-similar airplanes, especially if confronted with an unexpected upset event.

• Aerodynamic principles do not change, but airplane design may create different flight characteristics.
• Training and experience gained in one model or type of airplane may or may not be transferable.
• Inertia effects, roll and pitch rate responses, stability and maneuverability, the requirement to use rudder, straight wing versus swept wing, cockpit visibility and flight control systems are several critically important distinctions between airplane types.

7.2.6. Post Upset Conditions

There could be confusion on the flight deck as to what exactly happened to cause the original upset.

Care should be taken not to take action that could cause a repeat of the previous upset or let the airplane progress into a different kind of upset.

7.3. Airplane Upset Recovery Techniques

Training related to upset and/or stalls should emphasize awareness and avoidance.

Situationally aware flight crews are those who actively monitor their flight.

As such, they are able to assess the energy, arrest any flight path divergence and recover to a stabilized flight path before an extreme upset ever occurs.

Upset recovery techniques can be refined into either:

• Nose high
• Nose low.

This provides the basis for relating the aerodynamic information and techniques to specific situations.

Consolidation of recovery techniques into these two situations is done for simplification and ease of retention.

Autopilots (A/P) and autothrottles (A/THR) are generally intended to be used when the airplane is within its normal flight envelope.

If the A/P and/or A/THR are responding correctly to a flight path and/or energy divergence, it may not be appropriate to decrease the level of automation. Adhere to OEM guidance.

The following animation illustrates an overlay of what the airplane reaction would have been with autoflight system remaining engaged (red track) compared to disengaged with pilot inputs (blue track).

If the A/P and A/THR are not responding correctly they must be disconnected.

Analysis of the energy state of the airplane is required. This analysis assesses the energy and trend.

7.3.1. Stall

The recovery techniques assume the airplane is not stalled.

If the airplane is stalled, it is necessary to first recover from the stalled condition before initiating upset recovery techniques.

Follow your OEM procedure for stall recovery.

Regardless of attitude, a wing can be stalled at any airspeed and altitude, if the critical angle of attack is exceeded. It is important to understand that at high speeds, although it is possible to stall the wing, the structural design limits could be exceeded well before the stall actually occurs.

Previously, pilots were improperly trained and evaluated to recover from an approach to stall with emphasis on minimum loss of altitude while "powering" out of the near-stalled condition.

The only way to recover from a stall is to reduce the Angle of Attack.

Regardless of how close the airplane is to the ground, it is impossible to recover from a stalled condition without reducing the angle of attack and that will certainly result in a loss of altitude.

Although the thrust or power may supplement the recovery, it is not the primary control.

At stall angles of attack, the drag is very high and excess thrust available to overcome this drag may be marginal.

If the engines are at idle, the engine acceleration could be very slow, thus extending the recovery.

At high altitudes, available thrust is reduced.

The elevator is the primary control to recover from a stalled condition because, without reducing the angle of attack, the airplane will remain in a stalled condition until ground impact, regardless of the altitude at which it started.

Stall recovery requires a deliberate and smooth reduction in angle of attack.

Thrust/power can supplement the recovery only after the angle of attack has been reduced below the critical angle of attack.

Although stall angle of attack is normally constant for a given configuration, at high altitudes swept wing airplanes will stall at a reduced angle of attack due to Mach effects.

The pitch attitude for recovery will also be significantly lower than what is experienced at lower altitudes.

Buffet will likely precede an impending stall on swept wing airplanes and may even occur before the activation of stall warning devices.

Recovery from the stall is the primary objective, and altitude loss must be accepted. Flight crews must exchange altitude for energy.

Unlike low altitude recovery from stall, at high altitude, considerable altitude will be lost.

If altitude recovery is attempted prematurely, a secondary stall will likely occur.

If landing gear and/or slats and flaps are already extended, it is important to not change the airplane configuration until the airplane vertical flight path has been brought back under control.

While it is routine to reduce the flap setting on a standard go around as a means of reducing airplane drag, in a high angle of attack situation, the increase in angle of attack that occurs as the flap transitions may place the airplane deeper into the stalled condition resulting a delayed recovery and increased loss of altitude.

In a similar fashion, selection of landing gear up results in a substantial increase in airplane drag for the period the landing gear doors are open on many airplane types. In a critical recovery situation, the increase in drag would result in a further unanticipated loss of airspeed.

Follow your OEM specific procedures for a stall event with respect to changing airplane configuration during the recovery back to normal flight conditions.

7.3.2. Consolidated Summary of airplane Recovery Techniques

The following techniques represent a logical progression for recovering the airplane.

They are not necessarily procedural.

The sequence of actions is for guidance only and represents a series of options for the pilot to consider and to use depending on the situation.

Not all actions may, or should, be necessary once recovery is underway.

If needed, use pitch trim sparingly.

Careful use of rudder to aid roll control should be attempted only if roll control is ineffective and the airplane is not stalled.

These techniques assume the airplane is not stalled. A stalled condition can exist at any attitude and may be recognized by continuous stall warning activation accompanied by one or more of the following:

1. buffeting, which could be heavy at times;
2. lack of pitch authority and/or roll control; and
3. inability to arrest the descent rate.

It is not appropriate to wait until several stall cues are experienced prior to initiating the recovery.

7.3.3. Nose High Recovery Techniques

Note: Follow the guidance published by your aircraft OEM.

7.3.4. Nose Low Recovery Techniques

Note: Follow the guidance published by your aircraft OEM.

8. OEM Recommended Training Sequences
Upset Prevention and Recovery Training – FSTD Scenarios

Note:
Training assumption: All scenarios will be demonstrated to effectively teach the trainee when (or if it is necessary) to disconnect the autoflight system.
For example, if transitioning a wake encounter, it may be best to leave the autoflight system engaged rather than disconnecting it as long as the autoflight system is performing adequately.

8.1. Aircraft Handling Characteristics

8.1.1 Pitch Capabilities

Pitch response to pitch controller input

Condition

Demonstrate pitch rate performance of the airplane at different speeds and different configurations and with flaps retracted/extended. Also, show pitch rate performance at an aft CG versus a forward CG if flight qualities are significantly different.

Training

Demonstrate pitch response for a given controller deflection at V_REF versus clean configuration speed, and at 250 kt IAS, V_MO and M_MO.

Rationale

Demonstrate the pitch responses of the airplane at different speeds and altitudes.

For underwing mounted engines: pitch coupling when changing thrust

Condition

Demonstrate pitch coupling of the airplane when a large thrust change occurs, at low and high speeds, and low and high altitude.

Training

Demonstrate pitch response (coupling) for a large thrust increase (idle to go-around thrust), starting in trim at low altitude (2 000 feet) and low speed (in landing configuration at 1.1 V_S) versus at V_REF, in clean configuration at 250 kt IAS, V_MO or M_MO. Repeat in clean configuration at 1.1 V_S and M_MO at high altitude (cruising altitude).
Note: For airplanes that automatically trim or control the attitude when adjusting thrust (e.g. most fly-by-wire airplanes), the automatic pitch compensation system should be disabled for this exercise (e.g. direct law).

Rationale

Experience the pitch coupling of the airplane with thrust changes of underwing mounted engines, at different speeds and altitudes, including situations with marginal pitch control capability.

8.1.2 Roll Capabilities

Condition

Demonstrate roll rate performance of the airplane at different speeds and different configurations and with flight spoilers retracted/extended if a difference exists

Training

Demonstrate roll response at V_REF versus clean configuration speed, and at 250 kt IAS (below V_A)

Rationale

Demonstrate what the full roll capabilities of the airplane are.

8.1.3 Use of Rudder Demonstration

This is not to develop skills in maneuvering with rudder. Rather it is intended to highlight airplane reaction to rudder input, and the risk of over control or untimely rudder input (deflection when not needed).

Condition

If airplane roll is required, and if normal roll control is totally lost, there would be a requirement to use rudder in a manner it is not normally intended to be used.

Training

Use rudder to achieve desired bank angles to maneuver at various altitudes.

Rationale

Pilots need to clearly understand the risks of inputting rudder when it is not needed. This demonstration is to illustrate that with extremely careful rudder inputs, very small bank angles can be achieved.

However, the objective of the demonstration is to highlight that too much rudder applied too quickly or held too long may result in loss of lateral and directional control and cause structural damage.

8.1.4 Energy Management

Engine performance/power

Condition

Demonstrate acceleration between two speeds of which the airplane is capable at low, medium and high altitude. For example, 200 to 250 knots at low, medium and high altitude (where those speeds correspond to Mach numbers at high altitude).

Training

Observe time to reach target speed in level flight and in descending flight.

Rationale

Demonstrate and highlight the reduced thrust/power available at higher altitudes.

Airplane Acceleration

Condition

Demonstrate acceleration performance from the second regime (back side of the power curve) at low altitude and high altitude.

Training

Observe capability with the thrust available (if available thrust will not permit acceleration, the only option will be to accelerate by descending).

Rationale

Demonstrate the potentially different recovery technique from flight in the second regime at low altitude versus high altitude.

High altitude engine power management

Condition

Demonstrate the relationship between maximum cruise/climb/continuous thrust and take-off/go-around (TOGA) thrust at high altitude.

Training

Highlight to the pilot, the practical relationship between available engine power modes at high altitude.

Rationale

Teach the pilot that TOGA is not likely to produce more thrust at maximum altitude than cruise thrust, for example.

High altitude energy management

Condition

Demonstrate acceleration capabilities through descent versus power application.

Training

The objective is to understand the advantage of using elevator instead of thrust levers to regain the desired energy state (observe a rapid acceleration during descent versus the slow acceleration previously demonstrated with only use of power).

Rationale

Demonstrate the inability of the airplane to power out of a high-altitude slow-down.

8.1.5 Buffet

Condition

Demonstrate high-speed buffet (if applicable) and low-speed buffet.

Training

Demonstrate the airplane behavior at the low and high-speed buffet entry. Highlight how loading the airplane in a high-speed buffet will aggravate the condition. With A/P off at high altitude, demonstrate buffet onset with increased bank angle during level flight.

Rationale

Teach the pilot to correctly identify the low- and high-speed buffet with corresponding recovery techniques.

8.2. Upset Recognition and Recovery

8.2.1 Nose High / Nose Low

Note

This training needs not be completed in simulators, however, if the choice is to use simulators, extreme care must be taken to ensure negative transfer of training does not result. Current simulators are not capable of generating sustained G loading, therefore any dynamic maneuvering will not be correctly simulated.

Condition

During upset recognition and recovery practice, the trainee will experience nose-high and nose-low, high and low speed, high and low bank angle airplane upsets. Each of these maneuvers requires the pilot to return the airplane to a normal flight condition.
Display the PFD parameters (attitude, airspeed and altitude) when upset so that the trainee interprets the situation and demonstrates appropriate recovery control inputs (pitch, roll, thrust and speedbrake controls).

Training

The expectation is that the trainee analyze the situation and demonstrate initial control inputs direction appropriate to the situation to recover from an upset and learns to manage the energy, arrest the flight path divergence and recover to a stabilized flight path.

Rationale

When faced with an upset and a rapidly evolving energy state, the trainee should be able to recognize the attitude and timely apply initial control inputs in the correct direction for the recovery procedure.

8.2.2 Spiral Dive

Condition

Loss of pilot situation awareness leading to a spiral dive. A spiral dive can be defined as "a steep descending turn with the airplane in an excessively nose-down attitude and with the airspeed and g-load increasing rapidly".

Training

Highlight how a loss of situation awareness can allow a flight path degradation leading to a spiral dive. Demonstrate the characteristics of airplane longitudinal and lateral-directional stability. Show that controlling the spiral is easily achieved by unloading the rapidly increasing g-loads while rolling the wings level, reducing power and NOT pulling back on the stick or yoke until approaching wings level. Point out how spirals tighten if an attempt is made to raise the nose before approaching wings level and note the rapid loss of height and rapid increase in airspeed.

Rationale

A spiral dive requires prompt action, because altitude is rapidly being exchanged for airspeed. Rapidly increasing g-loading will reduce roll effectiveness and it will be necessary to reduce the g-load to regain roll effectiveness. This is counter-intuitive while in a dive condition, even though it is of critical importance. It is also important that g forces are properly controlled during the recovery to avoid accelerated stall or overstress to the airplane. Getting trapped in a spiral dive can happen very easily if you get caught inadvertently flying into poor weather condition (unexpected transition from VMC to IMC) or flying at nighttime where no horizon exists to provide visual correction for misleading inner-ear cues. Airplane speed limitations can be rapidly exceeded in a spiral dive. Care must be taken to ensure that pilots fully understand the associated dangers and how to carry out effective recovery action.

8.3. Stall

These stall training scenarios are based upon the FAA AC for Stall and Stick-Pusher Training, and the Stick-Pusher and Adverse Weather Event Training Aviation Rulemaking Committee recommendations.

Condition 1

Clean configuration stall events (high altitude).

Training

In level flight with the autopilot on, introduce an event or reduce thrust to less than adequate for maneuvering flight. Simulator capabilities to induce stall events may include use of: airspeed slewing; attitude changes; airplane weight and CG changes; environmental changes; systems malfunctions (e.g. full or partial pitot/static blockage, artificial thrust reduction, disabling of automation).

Rationale

Pilots must be able to recognize the stall warning and immediately perform the stall recovery procedure. Demonstrate willingness to trade altitude for airspeed to accomplish an expeditious recovery from a stall event.

Condition 2

Take-off or departure stall event with partial flaps.

Training

The scenario should be conducted during take-off and/or departure, at an altitude that will allow for a recovery. For an unexpected stall event on departure prior to flaps being fully retracted crew distractions may be used as per condition 1.

Rationale

Due to incorrect previous regulatory guidance and testing criteria, pilots would attempt recovery with no loss of altitude and without recognizing the importance of pitch control and AOA.

Condition 3

Landing configuration stall event.

Training

Implement scenarios that result in stall events during an approach.

Rationale

Pilots must be able to recognize the stall warning and immediately perform the stall recovery procedure, demonstrate a deliberate and smooth reduction of AOA. Positive recovery from the stall event takes precedence over minimizing altitude loss.

Condition 4

Stick pusher demonstration (if equipped)

Training

In level flight at idle thrust with the autoflight system set up to maintain altitude, introduce an event or reduce airspeed to less than adequate for maneuvering flight allowing the stick pusher to activate.

Rationale

Often pilots attempt recovery by suddenly applying immediate back pressure to overcome the lift-saving nose-down elevator force being applied by the stick pusher.

8.4. Environmental factors

8.4.1 Mountain Wave, Rotor Cloud, Horizontal and Vertical Windshear

Condition

E.g. mountain wave, rotor cloud, horizontal and vertical windshear.

Training

Demonstrate how a rapid windshear can alter the flightpath of a high-altitude airplane.

Rationale

High altitude upset with environmental factors as a causal factor.

8.4.2 Effect on Icing on Turboprop Airplane Performance (PROP)

Condition

Entry into an unintended low energy situation as the result of failure to adequately monitor airplane performance in icing conditions.

Training

Demonstrate the correct use of airplane SOP's to monitor the airplane energy state, detect an unsustainable decrease in airplane performance and initiate the necessary change to the airplane flight profile to return to an acceptable energy state.

Rationale

Flight crews must consider atmospheric icing conditions to exist when visible moisture in any form is present (such as clouds, fog with visibility of one mile or less, rain, snow sleet and ice crystals) and air temperature is colder than that specified in the applicable OEM guidance (OAT, SAT or TAT).

Close monitoring of the rate of climb and the airspeed should be performed to allow detection of icing conditions that may not be obvious from a visual standpoint (such as clear ice accretion, for instance).

Therefore, as soon as a loss of performance is detected and even though icing may not be identified or considered as the cause for such loss of performance, descending without delay from the current altitude should always be considered as a possible course of action to regain or prevent further loss of performance.

As a general rule and based on experience, such environmental conditions have limited vertical extension. By descending several hundred or a few thousand feet, it is generally possible to exit such conditions. Descending combines three positive effects: it allows the flight crew to trade altitude for airspeed increase while reducing the angle of attack, the outside temperature will generally increase and the engines would provide more power.

In climb, the autopilot mode must be used in IAS mode or equivalent which protects the airplane against possible loss of performance (wind gradients, icing). The target IAS is recommended to be set to provide an airspeed margin above minimum icing speed for climb.

Given the factors that influence the rate of climb (weight, temperature, etc.), it may not be easy for the crew to detect a climb performance lower than normal. However the value of the rate of climb itself provides the crew with an essential cue of what the absolute performance of the airplane is. At any time a decrease in performance is detected, the flight crew must consider if it will be necessary to stop the climb and choose a cruise level below the initial target until the airplane regains performance.

At the latest, an average rate of climb that decreases below a predetermined minimum value must result in the climb being stopped (e.g. 100 ft/min or less is an indication that the airplane has reached its operational ceiling). Leveling off the airplane may not be enough to gain sufficient airspeed, which should lead the crew to descend to a lower level.

In cruise, the power is generally fixed. Depending on the altitude and temperature, this power level should bring the airplane to a specific cruise IAS. This target airspeed must be known and anticipated by the flight crew so that a deviation from this value could be easily identified.

As soon as a loss of airspeed is identified, the crew should assess whether the airspeed decay can be controlled or not. In case the target airspeed cannot be maintained, the crew should take all necessary actions to maintain airspeed with a sufficient margin above minimum speed for cruise flight.

To regain or maintain airspeed, a first action can be to increase the power up to the maximum power available. If this is not enough and the IAS continues to decrease, the crew should prepare a descent strategy (MSA available, escape route, coordination with ATC, PAN or Mayday message if necessary to execute an immediate descent).

The time available to the crew between the moment they identify the loss of airspeed and the moment they need to take an action depends on the margin that is available above the minimum speed and the rate of ice accretion. For this reason it is recommended, if icing conditions are likely on the planned route, to choose a flight level that provides a cruise speed a predetermined value above the minimum icing speed for cruise flight. To provide such a buffer adhere to OEM guidance for the specific airplane type.

At the latest when the airspeed, after having decreased, approaches the minimum icing speed, the crew shall immediately apply the applicable AFM procedure and initiate a descent.

8.5. Wake Vortex

Condition

Take-off and approach configuration-behind a heavy airplane.

Training

Demonstrate how a prompt roll can alter the flight path of an airplane.

Rationale

Awareness of how a vortex can affect the airplane, i.e. understanding that different roll capabilities and mass of the airplane would affect how a pilot would respond to a wake encounter. Particular emphasis must be placed on time to transition through the vortex and effective mitigation strategies.

8.6. Mechanical / System-Induced

Condition

Upset as a function of roll, yaw and pitch path failures.

Training

Demonstrate how a failure or degradation of flight controls affecting each axis can create an upset. Training has to be airplane-specific to correctly reflect failure mode of that airplane (for example, hydraulics/fly-by-wire/autopilot failure).

Rationale

Airplane-specific training to illustrate how a flight control failure can create an upset and how to mitigate the effect (for example, a rudder hard over/runaway or limited or uncontrollable flight control surfaces).

8.7. Pilot factors

8.7.1 Loss of Situation awareness

Condition

Loss of pilot situation awareness leading to loss of control (LOC).

Training

Highlight how a loss of situation awareness can allow a flight path degradation leading to LOC (for example, loss of autothrottles; misusing pitch, roll or yaw trim; thrust asymmetry, airspeed loss from changes to the temperature when operating at too high an altitude, forgetting to reengage autothrottle after making an entry in an engine monitoring log).

Rationale

Recent accidents have shown a failure of the crews to effectively and actively monitor their airplane energy state and/or understand system logic.

8.7.2 Autoflight System Induced

Condition

Entry into an inadvertent low energy situation or stall as the result of misuse of or failure to adequately monitor autoflight systems.

Training

Demonstrate how the autoflight system could be misused to cause the airplane to unintentionally lose airspeed and/or achieve an excessive nose high attitude. Training to be airplane specific to correctly reflect the modes and indications available to the flight crew (for example, using vertical speed mode during climb/inadvertent disconnect of autothrust).

Rationale

Airplane-specific training to illustrate how the autoflight systems can create low energy situations leading to upset and how to avoid this by proper use of and monitoring those systems.

9. KEY POINTS HIGHLIGHTED THROUGHOUT THE TRAINING AID

10. Acronyms and Abbreviations